Jobs & CareersCommunity discussion

When does an interview task become a whole unpaid project?

A short task can show how somebody approaches work more clearly than another interview question. The difficulty is knowing where a reasonable assessment ends. A vague brief, several rounds of revisions, or work that looks ready for real customers can demand a lot from someone who has no offer yet. What boundaries would make these tasks fairer? Clear timing, a defined purpose, and an explanation of how the work will be used would help applicants decide. It should also be possible to ask about an alternative when a task requires equipment or time somebody cannot spare.

Replies 5

Had a similar experience? Tell us what helped.

Replying as Anonymous
Anonymous

Ask for the expected time commitment before starting. A task described as quick can mean very different things to the applicant and the person setting it.

Anonymous

Use sample material where possible and clarify ownership and use of the submission. Keep any confidential work from a previous employer out of an interview exercise.

Anonymous

A fixed stopping point makes the exercise fairer. Applicants should know whether a rough outline is enough or a finished deliverable is expected.

Anonymous

Ask who will review the task and what they are assessing. Clear criteria can prevent someone spending hours polishing a detail that was never relevant.

Anonymous

If a revision is requested, clarify whether it is still part of the assessment. Additional rounds should not quietly change the original time commitment.